Riemann hypothesis?

It appears that someone has just posted a 40 page preprint that claims to prove the Riemann hypothesis. I don’t know anything about the author or the research program that this came out of, so I can’t judge how likely it is to be correct. Does anyone else know?

Explore posts in the same categories: Misc.

9 Comments on “Riemann hypothesis?”

  1. Walt Says:

    Long experience with arxiv preprints makes me confident the answer is “not correct”, no matter how credible the source or research program.

  2. Maurizio Says:

    I don’t like your attitude either. Perelman’s proof of PoincarĂ© conjecture is a preprint of the arxiv. Of course this is not making me confident of the correctness of this proof, but it probably deserves some attention.

  3. Index Guy Says:

    Perelman’s proof was not titled “A proof of the Poincare conjecture”. So minus a few points for being so flashy.

  4. Rohit Says:

    For what it’s worth, the author was apparently a student of Louis de Branges who himself claims to have proven the Riemann Hypothesis in 2004.

  5. Walt Says:

    Maurizio: Why? Most announced proofs of famous results on arxiv are later retracted. Perelman is the only exception that I know of. I think it’s fine that they put up the preprints, assuming they’ve made a good faith effort to find any mistakes, but the more press the result gets, the more humiliating when they have to retract it. Someone announced a solution to the Navier-Stokes problem on arxiv that get sufficient press that it appeared in the newspaper. Someone later found a mistake — I can’t imagine that level of humiliation that person must have felt.

  6. Maurizio Says:

    Walt: i agree with you that a lot of press attention is not a good thing, i was just saying that a tentative proof should not be totally ignored by the scientific community just because it is a preprint on the arxiv. These proofs should get some more checking before being publicized, as you say they have a high probability of being wrong, and it can be humiliating for the publisher.
    Regards!


  7. It appears that Terry Tao has found a flaw in the proof, which he discusses in a comment on his blog.

  8. feldspar Says:

    Alain Connes found a better flaw.

    Btw, send me an email, Jesse. You know me from college (I saw Willow and Zach and figured I should reconnect with you, too). I’ll send you my non-pseudonomous address in return.

  9. yoyoyo Says:

    What, nobody cares about the recent combinatorial 14 page proof of the Poincare conjecture? For shame! http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.0577


Comment: